Skip to content

β˜•οΈπŸ§˜ Same workflow.

22.5Γ— β†’ 101.

1 min read

Originally posted on LinkedIn Β· 30 reactions Β· 1 comments Β· View original β†’

β˜•οΈπŸ§˜ Same workflow.

β˜•οΈπŸ§˜ Same workflow. New ceiling. 22.5Γ— β†’ 101.5Γ— in 4 months.

  • In Aug/Sep last year: I measured ~22.5Γ— vs. my pre-AI baseline on net code merged through strict quality gates.
  • Last 2 weeks: 101.5Γ— β†’ small pod, real product, strict quality gates, production-grade code. βœ…

The weird part: my workflow didn’t change. 🀯 Same build-measure-learn cycles with human-in-the-loop. Same agent harness.

What changed was the stack underneath it:

  • Opus 4.5 quietly levelled up (Dec-Jan: longer horizon, stronger task execution)
  • Claude Code improved as the orchestration layer (planning + execution ergonomics, control, flow)

This showed up while I was refactoring Euda, applying learnings from OpenClaw’s architecture (memory, first-class tool calling, skills, reactive/proactive loops, heartbeat/cron, etc.).

Next measurement round: Opus 4.6 + Agent Teams. Curious to see how much the ceiling moves again. πŸš€