βοΈπ§ Same workflow.
22.5Γ β 101.
1 min read
Originally posted on LinkedIn Β· 30 reactions Β· 1 comments Β· View original β

βοΈπ§ Same workflow. New ceiling. 22.5Γ β 101.5Γ in 4 months.
- In Aug/Sep last year: I measured ~22.5Γ vs. my pre-AI baseline on net code merged through strict quality gates.
- Last 2 weeks: 101.5Γ β small pod, real product, strict quality gates, production-grade code. β
The weird part: my workflow didnβt change. π€― Same build-measure-learn cycles with human-in-the-loop. Same agent harness.
What changed was the stack underneath it:
- Opus 4.5 quietly levelled up (Dec-Jan: longer horizon, stronger task execution)
- Claude Code improved as the orchestration layer (planning + execution ergonomics, control, flow)
This showed up while I was refactoring Euda, applying learnings from OpenClawβs architecture (memory, first-class tool calling, skills, reactive/proactive loops, heartbeat/cron, etc.).
Next measurement round: Opus 4.6 + Agent Teams. Curious to see how much the ceiling moves again. π